Materiality and flux analysis
How big a difference has to be before it matters, and the line-by-line review that explains every P&L movement before sign-off.
Every step in that table raises the same question: how big does a difference have to be before it matters? That's materiality. The tempting answer is a fixed percentage of revenue or net income, and the SEC has explicitly rejected that as a substitute for judgment. A percentage can be a starting point but not the whole call. A small error that turns a loss into a profit, or hides a covenant breach, matters whatever its size.
Flux analysis is the last review before sign-off. Every P&L line is compared with what it should have been, and anything that moved past a set threshold gets a sentence of explanation. In a normal month you compare against last month and the budget. Northwind has no last month, so September is read against expectation. Payroll should match the payroll register, rent should match the lease, and cost of revenue should be 54% of sales if the price list holds. If nobody can explain a line, it hasn't been reviewed.
Where this lesson's rules come from
The sources behind this lesson's requirements, by kind. Anything marked as a convention is ours, not the rule-maker's.
- SEC
- SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 99 (1999) (opens in a new tab)Materiality is not a percentageFree to read
The full map is in US GAAP, and where these rules come from.
The words this page teaches
Each links to its glossary definition, which also names the authority behind it and the components that render it.