Skip to content

Burn multiple, explained

Net burn divided by net new ARR over the same period. It says how many dollars you burned to add a dollar of recurring revenue. Lower is better. It's a metric, not a GAAP figure.

Section
Finance & metrics
Mentioned in
2 pages
Illustration only. No real figures.

What it means

The burn multiple says how many dollars of cash you burned to add one dollar of new annual recurring revenue. A multiple of 2 means $2 burned for every $1 of new ARR. Lower means more efficient growth.

It ties together the two numbers an early-stage board watches most: how fast cash goes out and how fast recurring revenue grows.

Take net burn for a period, usually a quarter or the trailing twelve months. Divide it by net new ARR for the same period, which is ending ARR minus starting ARR, so churn and downgrades are already netted out. The usual definition uses net burn; gross burn makes the multiple look worse.

If net new ARR is zero or negative, the division gives a meaningless result, so report the ARR change instead. It's a venture metric with no standard-setter behind it, and it isn't a GAAP figure.

In the second quarter Acme's net burn was $300,000, and ARR rose from $420,000 to $570,000, adding $150,000. The burn multiple is $300,000 ÷ $150,000, or 2.0. In the third quarter Acme burns the same $300,000 but adds $250,000 of ARR, and the multiple drops to 1.2.

David Sacks of Craft Ventures popularized it in 2020 with a rough scale: under 1 amazing, 1 to 1.5 great, 1.5 to 2 good, 2 to 3 suspect, above 3 bad. He allowed more at seed, where around 3 is common, tightening after the Series A. A multiple that climbs while burn stays flat usually means growth is slowing.

Why it matters. Popularized by David Sacks of Craft Ventures in 2020, it folds growth and spend into one number investors use to compare efficiency across companies at different stages.

Try it with your numbers

Change any number. The working below updates as you type.

Burn multiple for a quarterBurn multiple = Net burn ÷ Net new ARR
$

Usually a quarter.

$
$

Burn multiple

2.0×

How it’s worked out

  1. 1Net new ARR$570,000 − $420,000$150,000
  2. 2Burn multiple$300,000 ÷ $150,0002.0×

You burned $300,000 to add $150,000 of ARR. Lower is better. Sacks calls about 2× reasonable early on and treats 3× or more as a warning sign. It's a metric, not a GAAP figure.

Common questions

What period should I use?

A quarter or a trailing twelve months is common, so one large deal doesn't swing it. Use the same period for burn and ARR.

Where does the measure come from?

David Sacks of Craft Ventures popularized it in a 2020 essay as a way to compare capital efficiency. There's no standard-setter behind it, so state your definition.

What's a good burn multiple?

On Sacks's scale, under 1 is amazing, 1 to 1.5 great, 1.5 to 2 good, 2 to 3 suspect and above 3 bad. Earlier companies get more room. Compare against your own trend first, using the same definition each quarter.

Where it comes up

The glossary entries, founder guides and lessons on this site that use the term and link here.

Read further

Works in your QuickBooks Online or Xero file

Want your books closed every month?

Lopifi is building AI bookkeeping that keeps your books closed on US GAAP as transactions happen, with a CPA review every quarter, for $200 a month. We’re not open yet.

$200/month when we open. No card now.

General information for US companies, not tax, legal or accounting advice. Check the specifics with a CPA before you act on them.